![]() Um, and I feel like it just I feel like it was a little bit more disappointed than the money in the bank match. This one was obviously still great, but I think, Um, I think right now what they're trying to do is they're trying to tease a breakup from the street profits and I think they're more concerned with that than the quality of the match this time. I thought that was an excellent match between the street profits and and USSO's. Um, I thought the money in the bank match was superb. However, I do not feel like this match was as good as the money in the bank one. I felt like I feel like when the USA is in the street profits meet, it's always gonna be a good match. I mean he was just it could have put a regular referee in there and it would have been the same outcome. ![]() I don't think he really played a factor in this match at all. ![]() I think even though I don't mind, I don't necessarily mind a Jeff Jarrett appearance, I do think the only reason he was a special guest referee was because he's from Nashville and people they just wanted to bring a little nostalgia back to Nashville with Jeff Jarrett. What were your thoughts on usays versus street profits? Well, I'll piggyback off that. He goes, who better to bring on to referee uh, this controversial match? Then Jeff Jarrett, and I was like, uh, the only reason you brought him in because he lives in Nashville and he was easy to get. I made a joke at the beginning of the match where they forgot who who it was, but they're like, or, I think it was Michael Cole. Uh, speaking of the USOS, right, we've got the next match, the USSOS versus the street profits, with special guests referee Jeff Jarrett. Get ready for some more fun, because we're coming right back at you right now. And welcome back, nerds, your boy young Phil from the distance nording podcast, bringing you back and continuing this summer slam roundtable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |